Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
17 May 2006 A New Alderfly in Baltic Amber (Megaloptera: Sialidae)
Wilfried Wichard, Michael S. Engel
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new species of alderfly (Megaloptera: Sialidae) is described and figured from a rare adult specimen preserved in middle Eocene (Lutetian) Baltic amber. Sialis (Protosialis) voigti, new species, is distinguished from the two other species of Protosialis recorded from Baltic amber. The Megaloptera documented from Baltic amber are briefly overviewed and the geological history of Sialidae summarized.

Introduction

The Megaloptera (alderflies, dobsonflies, and fishflies) are relatively primitive members of the holometabolan superorder Neuropterida, notable for the plesiomorphic retention of a broad anal region in the hind wing. The order consists of about 275 species distributed throughout the world and segregated into two modern families—the large and robust Corydalidae (dobsonflies, fishflies), and the more diminutive Sialidae (alderflies). Larvae of both families are aquatic and generalist predators of small invertebrates. The final-instar larva emerges from the water and pupates in a chamber dug into soft soil. The adults are relatively short-lived, some living merely a week, and spend almost all of their time in vegetation near water.

Since Megaloptera are essentially aquatic insects, at least in their immature stages, their occurrence in Baltic amber is not common. Indeed, only 15–20 inclusions of adult Megaloptera seem to be known. Remarkably, two mature larvae are also known as amber inclusions, both of the family Sialidae—the first recorded by Weidner (1958; Weitschat and Wichard, 2002), the second nearly a half a century later by Wichard (2005: fig. 1). These larvae were almost assuredly entombed shortly after leaving the water and while attempting to find a suitable location for a pupal chamber. In total the Baltic amber fauna contains seven species of Megaloptera, summarized in table 1.

Herein we provide the description of a new species of alderfly recently recognized in Baltic amber. The new species belongs to the modern genus Sialis and the subgenus Protosialis in particular, and is known from two adult females. Morphological terminology and venational nomenclature follow that employed elsewhere for Megaloptera (e.g., Wichard, 1997, 2002). The age and origin of Baltic amber has been reviewed by Weitschat and Wichard (2002) and Grimaldi and Engel (2005).

Systematic Paleontology

Genus Sialis Latreille

Sialis Latreille, 1802: 290. Type species: Hemerobius lutariusLinnaeus, 1758, by monotypy.

Protosialis van der Weele, 1909: 263. Type species: Semblis americanusRambur, 1842, by original designation. [recognized as a subgenus]

Ilyobius Enderlein, 1910: 381. Type species: Ilyobius flavicollisEnderlein, 1910, by original designation. [ =  Protosialis]

Nipponosialis Kuwayama, 1962: 329. Type species: Sialis jezoensisOkamoto, 1910, by original designation. [ =  Sialis s.str.]

Protosiails Penny, 1977: 9. Lapsus calami pro Protosialis.

Diagnosis:

Adult with head prognathous and relatively flattened; compound eyes large, positioned laterally; ocelli absent; antennae filiform; mandibles strong, multidentate. Pronotum broad (width up to twice length), rectangular or trapezoid; meso- and metathorax of equivalent proportions and design. Legs moderately long and stout; tarsi pentamerous, fourth tarsomere bilobed (and heart-shaped), with fifth tarsomere inserted near base. Wings well developed, with complete venation typical of the order; fore- and hind wings with Sc fusing with R1 before wing apex, R3 forked in Sialis s.str., simple in Protosialis, M1+2 simple; forewing with M3+4 forked (New and Theischinger, 1993). Males with nine, females with seven fully exposed abdominal segments.

Comments:

The foundation for the classification and determination of species of Sialidae are the works of Lestage (1927) and Weele (1909, 1910). Weele (1909, 1910) established Protosialis as a separate genus. Later, Ross (1937) considered Protosialis a synonym of Sialis, and Whiting (1994) considered the group to be a basal subgenus. Today some authors prefer to retain Protosialis as generically distinct, but we consider it as a subgenus pending a comprehensive cladistic analysis of species in Sialidae. Unlike Sialis s.str., Protosialis has R3 simple in both the fore- and hind wings while this vein is forked in the former group (New and Theischinger, 1993).

Sialis (Protosialis) voigti, new species Figures 2{ label needed for fig[@id='i0003-0082-3513-1-1-f04'] }Figure 6.8

Diagnosis:

The new species shows the diagnostic combination of features typical of the subgenus Protosialis; i.e., R3 and M1+2 are both unforked in the fore- and hind wings and M3+4 is forked in the forewing (New and Theischinger, 1993). The new species can most readily be distinguished from the other Protosialis species in Baltic amber by the combination of R2 forked in both fore- and hind wings and by M3+4 unforked in the hind wing (table 2). In addition, R4 and R5 in both the fore- and hind wings are unforked.

Description:

Female. Total body length approximately 11.5 mm. Integument imbricate and dark brown where evident; wing veins dark brown, membrane hyaline. Head about as long as wide, with large compound eyes positioned laterally on anterior half of head. Mandibles stout; maxillary palpi 5-segmented; labial palpi 3-segmented; other mouthpart structures not discernable. Left antenna with 28 antennomeres (i.e., including scape and pedicel), right antenna partial; flagellomeres of roughly equal size, each slightly longer than wide. Ocelli absent. Tarsi of typical pentamerous construction, with fourth tarsomere bilobed and heart-shaped (distinguishing feature of Sialidae, along with the absence of ocelli). Forewing approximately 14 mm in length; costal field weakly arched, giving wing a slender form; seven c-sc crossveins present before termination of Sc; R1 running parallel with Sc (with narrow subcostal cell between them) before veins merge near wing midpoint; R2 forked near wing apex; R3, R4, and R5 simple at wing apex; M1+2 simple; M3+4 forked near wing apex. Hind wing with R2 forked near wing apex; R3, R4, R5, M1+2, and M3+4 simple (the last vein is easily seen in the right hind wing but challenging to discern in the left hind wing). Female terminalic sclerites as depicted in figure 6; sternite VIII with two, well-differentiated, lateral calli.

Holotype:

Adult female in middle Eocene Baltic amber (figs. 2, 3); accession number KU-NHM-ENT, B-003; located in the Fossil Insect Collection, Division of Entomology, University of Kansas Natural History Museum, Lawrence, Kansas.

Preservation:

The holotype is on one side of a large, oval piece of clear, yellow amber of maximally 39 mm length and 20 mm width, with a mass of 3.3 g. In the immediate vicinity of the alderfly is a partial caddisfly (only the front half of the body preserved, the distal half of the body and the distal third of the wings are cut off) along the amber's edge. The maxillary palps, antennae, and legs permit identification of the caddisfly as a species of Leptoceridae (Trichoptera). The remaining and larger portion of the amber contains fine detritus and numerous stellate trichomes, characteristic of Baltic amber.

The alderfly is in remarkably good condition and, aside from being rather complete, is also well positioned in the amber, permitting detailed examination. The specimen has some Schimmel (a froth of microscopic bubbles) obscuring the integument in some areas, but none of it prevents identification. The right forewing is rather extensively damaged along its leading edge while the left forewing is complete, only slightly obscured near the apex of its posterior margin by the left hind wing being partly folded forward (figs. 4, 5). Both hind wings can be seen in ventral aspect and, despite a few minor folds and some obscuring by the abdomen, the venation can be easily discerned (figs. 4, 5). The legs are complete and preserved folded beneath the body. The right antenna is incomplete, but the left antenna is well preserved. The mouthparts are not easily viewed, except for the palpomeres of the labium and maxilla, which can be distinguished. The venter of the abdomen is easily examined, and the female genital sclerites can be sufficiently discerned (fig. 6).

Additional Material:

An adult female in middle Eocene Baltic amber (figs. 7, 8); specimen in the collection of Jürgen Velten, Idstein, Germany.

Etymology:

The specific epithet honors the late Peter C. Voigt (July 22, 1930–November 25, 2004). Peter was the heart and soul of the Bernstein Arbeitskreis (based in Hamburg), maintaining strong contact with each member and sharing with all his great enthusiasm for every aspect of amber and its study. He is greatly missed.

Comments:

The genital sclerites are typical for species of Sialis (e.g., Ross, 1937; New and Theischinger, 1993; Engel, 2004). Sternite VII is large and sclerotized but is otherwise little modified. Structural modifications are predominantly located on sternite VIII. Typically in Sialidae, sternite VIII forms a narrow, transverse strip with various, species-specific modifications. In S. voigti sternite VIII consists of two calli that are well separated medially (fig. 6). The calli are particularly strong apicolaterally and their form reinforced by a strong medial depression. Tergite IX is enlarged and extends ventrally to the sides such that it can be seen in ventral aspect, the apicolateral margins bordering the gonapophyses of the ovipositor (fig. 6). Subapically on the ventral margin of each gonapophysis is positioned a minute stylus. Cercal calli can be seen lateral to the ovipositor.

Discussion

With the discovery of S. voigti, the number of alderflies in Baltic amber has risen to four and the number of Megaloptera to seven (table 1). Alderflies are exceptionally rare in amber, with only two larval and six adult (including the four holotypes) specimens documented. The two additional adult specimens are recorded as a paratype of S. herrlingiWichard (2002) and the other as a putative S. voigti (herein, vide supra). The putative specimen of S. voigti has only the right forewing recognizable in which it depicts the forked R2 and unforked R3, R4, and R5, unforked M1+2, and forked M3+4 typical for the species. The hind wings, however, are entirely covered, and the rear of the body is damaged and cleared (figs. 7, 8). Thus, definitive placement is not possible, but the evidence from the forewing is strongly suggestive.

Almost all fossil records of sialids are from the Tertiary and almost exclusively from Europe, with single records from Asia Minor and Australia (table 3). The earliest record of an alderfly is Dobbertinia reticulata (Handlirsch, 1925) (Sialidae: Dobbertiniinae) from the Liassic of Germany (Ansorge, 2001). Dobbertinia is plesiomorphic in almost all details for Sialidae but exhibits the characteristic partial desclerotization of MA in the forewing. Unfortunately, an approximately 120 million year gap exists until the next record of a fossil alderfly, a wing fragment of an unnamed Austrosialis from the Paleocene of Queensland, Australia (Lambkin, 1992). A real diversity of sialids is first observed in the Eocene, particularly the fauna recorded from Baltic amber. However, given the extreme paucity of specimens it is impossible to ascertain the true diversity of sialids in the Late Mesozoic or Early Tertiary and whether the family was already well established in during the Cretaceous or, like some other insect groups such as ants, bees, termites, chrysidoid wasps (Grimaldi and Engel, 2005; Engel, 2005), they were present but did not diversify until later in their evolution. Given the low diversity of Megaloptera today it is most likely that they have always been relatively species-poor and in moderate abundance. It is greatly hoped that more complete and extensive material of fossil Sialidae, particularly from the Cretaceous, will eventually be discovered and the evolution of this order more fully understood.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Drs. Vladimir A. Blagoderov and Roy J. Beckemeyer for comments on the manuscript; to Mr. Claus Lüer, scientific illustrator in Cologne, for executing the line drawings; and to Mr. Jürgen Velten, Idstein, for permitting us to study Sialis inclusions in Baltic amber from his collection. Partial support for this work has been provided by NSF EF-0341724 (to MSE) and the General Research Fund of the University of Kansas Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology (#2301360, to MSE). This is contribution No. 3437 of the Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, University of Kansas.

References

1.

J. Ansorge 2001. Dobbertinia reticulata Handlirsch, 1920 from the Lower Jurassic of Dobbertin (Mecklenburg/Germany)—the oldest representative of Sialidae (Megaloptera). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 2001:553–564. Google Scholar

2.

G. Enderlein 1910. Eine neue Sialis aus Columbien. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 71:380–381. Google Scholar

3.

M. S. Engel 2004. The alderflies of Kansas (Megaloptera: Sialidae). Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 107:3–4119–125. Google Scholar

4.

M. S. Engel 2005. A dryinine wasp in Burmese amber (Hymenoptera: Dryinidae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 74:4485–494. Google Scholar

5.

D. Grimaldi and M. S. Engel . 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. xv + 755. Google Scholar

6.

A. Handlirsch 1925. Palaeontologie. In C. Schröder (editor). Handbuch der Entomologie, Band 3: Geschichte, Literatur, Technik, Paläontologie, Phylogenie, Systematik: 117–306 Jena: Fischer, viii + 1201 pp. Google Scholar

7.

J. Illies 1967. Megaloptera and Plecoptera (Ins.) aus den jungpliozänen Süßwassermergeln von Willershausen. Bericht der Naturhistorischen Gesellschaft zu Hannover 111:47–55. Google Scholar

8.

S. Kuwayama 1962. A revisional synopsis of the Neuroptera in Japan. Pacific Insects 4:325–412. Google Scholar

9.

K. J. Lambkin 1992. A record of Austrosialis Tillyard from the Queensland Paleocene (Insecta: Megaloptera: Sialidae). Queensland Naturalist 31:3–484–86. Google Scholar

10.

P. A. Latreille 1802. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite à l'histoire naturelle générale et particulière, composée par Leclerc de Buffon, et rédigée par C.S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs sociétés savantes. Tome troisième [3]. Paris Dufart. xii + 467. Google Scholar

11.

W. E. Leach 1815. Entomology. In D. Brewster (editor). The Edinburgh Encyclopaedia [Vol. 9, part 1]: 57–172 Edinburgh: Blackwood, [2] + 766 pp. Google Scholar

12.

J. A. Lestage 1927. Le faune entomologique indo-chinoise, 2: Les Megaloptères. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique 67:71–90.93–119. Google Scholar

13.

C. Linnaeus 1758. Systema Naturae per regna tria natura, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis synonymis, locis [10th ed., revised]. Holmiae [Stockholm] Laurentii Salvii. 824. Google Scholar

14.

A. Nel 1988. Les Sialidae (Megaloptera) fossiles des diatomites de Murat (Cantal, France) et des Bes-Konak (Anatolie, Turque). Neuroptera International 5:139–44. Google Scholar

15.

A. Nel 1991. Nouveaux insectes neuroptéroïdes fossiles de l'Oligocène de France (Neuroptera et Megaloptera). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Série 4, Section C (Sciences de la Terre Paléontologie, Géologie, Minéralogie) 12:3–4327–349. Google Scholar

16.

A. Nel, J-J. Menier, G. de Ploëg, G. Hodebart, and L. Danvin . 2002. Eosialis, a new alderfly genus in French lowermost Eocene amber (Insecta, Megaloptera, Sialidae). Geobios 35:3313–319. Google Scholar

17.

T. R. New and G. Theischinger . 1993. Megaloptera: Alderflies, Dobsonflies. In M. Fischer (editor). Handbuch der Zoologie: Ein Naturgeschichte der Stämme des Tierreiches, Band IV Arthropoda: Insecta, Teilband 33: 1–97 Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 102 pp. Google Scholar

18.

H. Okamoto 1910. Die Sialiden Japans. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung 29:255–263. Google Scholar

19.

N. D. Penny 1977. Lista de Megaloptera, Neuroptera e Raphidioptera do México, América Central, ilhas Caraíbas e América do Sul. Acta Amazônica, suplemento 7:1–61. Google Scholar

20.

F. J. Pictet-Baraban and H. Hagen . 1856. Die im Bernstein befindlichen Neuropteran der Vorwelt. In G.C. Berendt (editor). Die im Berstein befindlichen organischen Reste der Vorwelt [Vol. 2]: 41–126 Berlin: Nicolaischen Buchhandlung, [2] + 126 pp. Google Scholar

21.

J. P. Rambur 1842. Histoire naturelle des insectes, Néuroptères. Paris Fain et Thunot. xvii + 534. Google Scholar

22.

H. H. Ross 1937. Nearctic alder flies of the genus Sialis (Megaloptera, Sialidae). Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 21:57–78. Google Scholar

23.

H. W, van der Weele 1909. New genera and species of Megaloptera Latr. Notes from the Leyden Museum 30:249–264. Google Scholar

24.

H. W, van der Weele 1910. Megaloptera. Collections Zoologiques du Baron Edm. de Selys Longchamps, Catalogue Systématique et Descriptif 5:1–93. Google Scholar

25.

H. Weidner 1958. Einige interessante Insektenlarven aus der Bernsteininklusen-Sammlung des Geologischen Staatsinstituts Hamburg (Odonata, Coleoptera, Megaloptera, Planipennia). Mitteilungen des Geologischen Staatsinstituts Hamburg 27:50–68. Google Scholar

26.

W. Weitschat and W. Wichard . 2002. Atlas of Plants and Animals in Baltic Amber. Munich Friedrich Pfeil Verlag. 256. Google Scholar

27.

M. F. Whiting 1994. Cladistic analysis of the alderflies of American north of Mexico (Megaloptera: Sialidae). Systematic Entomology 19:177–91. Google Scholar

28.

W. Wichard 1997. Schlammfliegen aus baltischen Bernstein (Megaloptera, Sialidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 80:197–211. Google Scholar

29.

W. Wichard 2002. Eine neue Schlammfliege aus dem baltischen Bernstein (Megaloptera, Sialidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 86:253–261. Google Scholar

30.

W. Wichard 2003. Chauliodes, ein Großflügler im baltischen Bernstein (Megaloptera, Corydalidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg 87:147–158. Google Scholar

31.

W. Wichard 2005. Wasserinsekten im baltischen Bernstein—Zeitzeugen eines alttertiären Waldes. Biologie in unserer Zeit 35:283–89. Google Scholar

32.

W. Wichard, C. Chatterton, and A. J. Ross . 2005. Corydasialidae fam. n. (Megaloptera) from Baltic amber. Insect Systematics and Evolution 36:3279–283. Google Scholar

Figure 1.

Photomicrograph of a mature alderfly larva in middle Eocene Baltic amber (private collection of Mr. Jürgen Velten, Idstein).

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-f01.gif

Figure 2–3. Photomicrographs of the holotype female of Sialis (Protosialis) voigti, n.sp.2. Dorsal aspect. 3. Ventral aspect.

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-f02.jpg

{ label needed for fig[@id='i0003-0082-3513-1-1-f04'] }

Figure 4–5. Line illustration of the holotype female of Sialis (Protosialis) voigti, n.sp.4. Dorsal aspect. 5. Ventral aspect.

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-f04.gif

Figure 6.

Ventral aspect of the terminalia of the female holotype of Sialis (Protosialis) voigti, n.sp.

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-f06.gif

Figure 7–8. A putative specimen of Sialis (Protosialis) voigti, n.sp.7. Illustration of the specimen. 8. Photomicrograph of the specimen.

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-f07.gif

Table 1.

Baltic Amber Megaloptera

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-t01.gif

Table 2.

Comparison of Baltic Amber Protosialis

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-t02.gif

Table 3.

Described Fossil Sialidae (Records of subfossils, i.e., Pleistocene or younger, are excluded)

i0003-0082-3513-1-1-t03.gif
Wilfried Wichard and Michael S. Engel "A New Alderfly in Baltic Amber (Megaloptera: Sialidae)," American Museum Novitates 2006(3513), 1-9, (17 May 2006). https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3513[1:ANAIBA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 17 May 2006
Back to Top